> The amusing thing is that an LLM who had access to the thread would have alerted you to a basic error you're making.

I didn't make the "basic error" of assuming you didn't know spellcheckers existed. I was stressing that since spellcheckers already exist, you don't need an AI assisting your comments-writing. Much basic, non-style-altering alternatives exist and are better.

> "You can always ..." is not an argument against alternatives.

The argument I'm making is that if you care so much about standards you can always hone them yourself instead of taking the lazy way out of having an AI write for you.

Alternatively, if you're lazy then your standards aren't too high.

And yes, this is an argument against the alternative you're suggesting.