undefined | Better HN

0 pointsruszki15d ago0 comments

For that you need to create something which you know exactly how you want to code, or what architecture is needed. In other words, you would win basically nothing, because typing was never the real bottleneck (no matter what VIM and Emacs people would tell you).

LLMs also make mistakes even way lower level than those one pagers allow you to control with the planning mode. Which I use all the time btw. And anyway, they throw the plan out of the window immediately when their tried solutions don't work during execution, for example when a generated test is failing.

Btw, changing the plan after its generation is painful. It happens more than not that when I decline it with comments it generates a worse version of it, because it either miss things from the previous one which I never mentioned, or changes the architecture to a worse one completely. In my experience, it's better to restart the whole thing with a more precise prompt.

0 comments

9wzYQbTYsAIc15d ago

Ah, this is true - for my purposes, I've been directing the design and deliberating on the constraints and specifications for a larger system in tandem with smaller planning sessions.

That has worked well so far, but yes, you are totally right, there are still quite a few pain points and it is still rather far from being fire-and-forget "build me a fancy landing page for a turnkey business" and getting enterprise quality code.

edit: I think it is most important that you collaborate with Claude Code on quality in a systematic way, but even that has limits, right now - 1M context changes things a little bit.

pepoluan15d ago

You know, with all the babysitting needed, I wonder if effort is not better spent in just, you know, writing code.

Can you actually quantify the time & effort 'saved' letting LLM generate code for you?

9wzYQbTYsAIc15d ago

For me, personally, I'm building things that would have been impractical for me to do as cleanly within the same amount of time - prototypes in languages that I don't have the muscle memory for, using algorithms i have a surface level understanding of but would need time to deeply understand and implement by hand, and, at my pace, as a retired dev, is probably quantified in terms of years worth of time and effort saved.

edit: also, would I take the time to implement LCARS by hand? No. But with an LLM, sure, took it about 3 minutes or less to implement a pretty decent LCARS interface for me.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsruszki15d ago0 comments

0 comments

9wzYQbTYsAIc15d ago

Ah, this is true - for my purposes, I've been directing the design and deliberating on the constraints and specifications for a larger system in tandem with smaller planning sessions.

edit: I think it is most important that you collaborate with Claude Code on quality in a systematic way, but even that has limits, right now - 1M context changes things a little bit.

pepoluan15d ago

You know, with all the babysitting needed, I wonder if effort is not better spent in just, you know, writing code.

Can you actually quantify the time & effort 'saved' letting LLM generate code for you?

9wzYQbTYsAIc15d ago

edit: also, would I take the time to implement LCARS by hand? No. But with an LLM, sure, took it about 3 minutes or less to implement a pretty decent LCARS interface for me.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse