> I would rather wait for official stats before claiming victory.
You sure about that?
With your recent comment history, you've been claiming victory for your rhetorical position without waiting for "official" stats (what makes a stat official?), and deny the stats which do exist as "propaganda".
That is in fact why I noted my newer reference was pointing to the same domain as you were using to claim yours.
As an aside: It's not like this is even a proper environmental victory condition yet, see my other links on that, just that the rate at which CO2 is going up (due to China) is not itself going up. "Victory" happens when atmospheric CO2 goes past 400 ppm again, this time downwards. All that can be said positively about China here is "heading in the right direction", although you seem to have a bee in your bonnet to deny even that.