- related topic 1
- related topic 2
- related topic 3"
And so on and so forth.
But 5.3 does something different.
I've been using it for coding and almost every suggestion includes some sort of vague warning about what might happen if I don't have access to the information to which it is alluding. Nearly contiguous (not cherry-picked) examples from my current chats:
"If you want, I can also show you two small tweaks that dramatically increase the success rate of “one-shot repo rewrites” with Claude Code. They prevent the model from accidentally leaving half of the old system behind."
"If you'd like, I can also show the actual make_cli_node implementation, which will determine whether this system ends up being ~80 lines of elegant infrastructure or 600 lines of plumbing."
"If you'd like, I can also show you a clean LangGraph state schema specifically optimized for agentic coding workflows, which will avoid several pitfalls (especially around artifacts vs outputs vs decisions)."
"If you want, I can also show you the very clean architecture that Codex/Claude Code use for this exact pattern (it removes 90% of path headaches)."
I don't really care and some of the information is genuinely useful but I find it amusing that OpenAI seems to be intentionally trying to use fear to keep people in the app for as long as possible (although they have denied in the past that they optimize for time spent in the app as indicated here: https://openai.com/index/our-approach-to-advertising-and-expanding-access/).
