undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbenj11123d ago0 comments

We aren't talking incest, we are talking depictions of incest in the same way as your favourite shows probably depict murder or violence.

0 comments

jermaustin123d ago

> we are talking depictions of incest

We aren't talking about depictions of incest either. There is no relation between step-siblings/parents/etc. And in these videos, every single person is unrelated to every other person even in the depictions. The step-child has both a step-mom and step-dad... Where I come from, that would be an adoption? I would guess the next form of these videos will be adoption porn.

benj111OP22d ago

Well ok there are a variety of issues going on.

I assumed it was 'step' relative inorder to stop it being incest, and that it's basically a wink to the audience without changing the 'script'. Personally I don't think changing the title is morally relevant so it doesn't matter to me what precise relation the script and title uses.

Which takes us back to depiction, they're all actors so what ever the laws are, it doesn't matter. Or shouldn't.

nephihaha22d ago

Incest isn't just about your genes. It's pretty dubious to get sexually involved with your adopted children if they are old enough.

The "step" thing is a get out clause. In the Netherlands, I've seen stuff advertised which doesn't even bother with that.

swat53522d ago

If you're arguing from a moral perspective it is subjective. You can also morally object to people drinking coffee.

Adult incest is opposed mainly due to genetic risks in offspring and blood relation issues.

Otherwise, consenting adults should be free to do as they please.

If the "stepdad" and "stepdaughter" met as strangers, you wouldn’t care.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse