Wikipedia has deprecated and will blacklist archive.today (opens in new tab)

(en.wikipedia.org)

16 pointsgyrovague-com1mo ago7 comments

7 comments

The archive.today owner made a good suggestion: Wikipedia should make their own archive. They can migrate all archive.xx snapshots there. They have the resources and it would be as resilient as Wikipedia itself.

jsheard1mo ago

Since Wikipedia established that the archiver tampered with stored pages I doubt migrating is on the cards, the trust in those archives has been burned regardless of who hosts them going forward.

armchairhacker1mo ago

AFAIK the only evidence of tampered pages are those involved in this controversy. That archive.xx could tamper pages has always been possible (and a reason why Wikipedia should have their own archive, and migrate ASAP).

But still, Wikipedia can corroborate any archive.xx page, and if they find a matching source, archive that instead.

1 more reply

LegionMammal9781mo ago

> Change the original source to something that doesn't need an archive (e.g., a source that was printed on paper), or for which a link to an archive is only a matter of convenience.

As if paper sources are any less susceptible to becoming increasingly unavailable over time...

Iolaum1mo ago

Is there more context available - sounds like there's a bigger story than what is mentioned in the article.

r7211mo ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624740

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46843805

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

7 comments

armchairhacker1mo ago

jsheard1mo ago

Since Wikipedia established that the archiver tampered with stored pages I doubt migrating is on the cards, the trust in those archives has been burned regardless of who hosts them going forward.

armchairhacker1mo ago

But still, Wikipedia can corroborate any archive.xx page, and if they find a matching source, archive that instead.

1 more reply

LegionMammal9781mo ago

> Change the original source to something that doesn't need an archive (e.g., a source that was printed on paper), or for which a link to an archive is only a matter of convenience.

As if paper sources are any less susceptible to becoming increasingly unavailable over time...

Iolaum1mo ago

Is there more context available - sounds like there's a bigger story than what is mentioned in the article.

r7211mo ago

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624740

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46843805

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse