See... this is kinda how I know you have a political axe to grind. You are not arguing principles, which makes your outrage.. shall we say less potent. You are arguing your favorite outcome.

Allow me a quick rewrite of your breathless response in a more reasonable language.

<< This was in a literal war zone against a man who literally declared war on the United States.

Was he targeted? Was he targeted willfully? Was he target ted willfully, while administration knew he was an American citizen? When did they know it? Did they stop their plans once they did?

And that is before we get into: do you stop being a citizen when president says so? Seems pretty apt given how we are about to cover Good.

<< Didn't answer my question. This law targeted terrorists, not mothers of two, driving home from dropping their kids off at school.

You are apparently cool with president determining, who the terrorists are. If so, ICE shooting a mother of two ( who was clearly not watching those two kids m ind you ) is just an expansion of powers Obama gave himself. Thanks Obama!

<< Didn't answer my question (x2).

You can barely answer yours. (x2)

<< I can't find any evidence that this was a legitimate leak investigation done in accordance with the law.

I literally laughed. Try harder. Maybe consult an llm? Maybe all those arguments about AI effectively being here already because the floor is so low are not that far fetched.

<< Reminder, we are talking about domestic surveillance and illegal detainment for political purposes.

Sigh, we are talking about what we are talking about. It is cute that you think you can control this conversation though. In a way, it is almost like watching a toddler walking for the first time. Don't get me wrong, it is adorable, but it doesn't change much.