undefined | Better HN

0 pointsD-Machine2mo ago0 comments

> Your framing is weirdly disingenuous

I am not surprised that you can't understand that the quote I am making is obviously parodying the OP as disingenuous. Given our previous interactions (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46938446), it is clear you don't understand much things about AI and/or LLMs, or, perhaps, basic communication, at all.

0 comments

famouswaffles2mo ago

OP's original comment is something that is actually happening in a bunch of comments on this very thread, and yours...not even remotely. You certainly tried to paint it as disingenuous but it really just fell flat. I'm not surprised you failed to understand that though.

>Given our previous interactions (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46938446), it is clear you don't understand much things about AI and/or LLMs at all.

Sure, Whatever makes you happy I guess.

D-MachineOP2mo ago

> It's interesting to me that whenever a new breakthrough in AI use comes up, there's always a flood of people who come in to handwave away why this isn't actually a win for LLMs.

>> OP's original comment is something that is actually happening in a bunch of comments on this very thread

OPs original comment was obviously a general claim not tied to responses to this thread. As usual, you fail to understand even the basics of what you are talking about.

famouswaffles2mo ago

His comment was a general claim, but he made it here specifically because this thread was already full of examples proving his point. Shouldn't that be Obvious?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

famouswaffles2mo ago

>Given our previous interactions (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46938446), it is clear you don't understand much things about AI and/or LLMs at all.

Sure, Whatever makes you happy I guess.

D-MachineOP2mo ago

> It's interesting to me that whenever a new breakthrough in AI use comes up, there's always a flood of people who come in to handwave away why this isn't actually a win for LLMs.

>> OP's original comment is something that is actually happening in a bunch of comments on this very thread

OPs original comment was obviously a general claim not tied to responses to this thread. As usual, you fail to understand even the basics of what you are talking about.

famouswaffles2mo ago

His comment was a general claim, but he made it here specifically because this thread was already full of examples proving his point. Shouldn't that be Obvious?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse