EDIT: I think you mean "allegedly"
God forbid individuals and organizations not choose paths of action that "low level piss off" millions of people such that their chance of being at the business end of some outlier who will actually do violence upon them is non-trivial.
It's not hard to not be "the thing" in any given crazy's life they choose to go out with a bang over, especially if you're not something they deal with every day. If that means that the default amount of screwage your organization applies needs to be dialed back, or that you must clean house a little better or more often then cry me a river.
>most adults in the room understand that "people being mad at you" is pretty independent of how righteous your cause is
Except it's not. The "budget" you have to wrong people and cause despair before people would be apathetic to violence done upon you is pretty directly coupled to the amount of good you do to offset your harm.
Well yeah, it's not exactly easy to get everyone to understand that insurance isn't magic and money out has to match money in.
So yeah, money out not matching money in is exactly the problem.
e.g. https://d12t4t5x3vyizu.cloudfront.net/ritchietorres.house.go...
Do you have any source?