That claim is incorrect because it takes in to account only one very small segment of the people who saw the movie (only US, Fandango-based, in-theater viewings are counted). That is not indicative of the wider audience feedback.
You also point out the discrepancy between professional reviewers and audience score ("The audience says: 99% Popcornmeter - 500+ Verified Ratings -The critics say: 10% Tomatometer - 20 Reviews - be careful who you listen to") as a reason for Rotten Tomatoes being untrustworthy, but the Tomatometer and the Popcorn Meter (all audience, not just verified) are close together (10% vs 28%).
Just curious, do you believe this movie to be good? Have you seen it? Or is this just a kneejerk reaction to defend an awful movie where more than 50% of the budget went directly the person the documentary is about?
but as much as you despise the people who do because you think you are superior in some way
> Melania film earns $7m in US, strongest documentary debut in over a decade
I don't care about the quality of the movie or feeling superior to the viewers who enjoy it. I hate the openly corrupt bribery via the pay she received for this documentary. She received 28 MILLION dollars out of the 40 MILLION dollars paid for the rights to produce this movie. Amazon is effectively purchasing favors from the Trump admin via this movie. That is unacceptable.
