Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
imtringued
4mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
He is against the "GPLv3 or later clause" because the FSF could change the license terms if it gets hijacked.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
direwolf20
4mo ago
He is against the GPLv3 itself. He's ideologically opposed to converting the kernel to GPLv3, even if it was possible.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse
