undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmhitza4mo ago0 comments

Offers such as Scaleway should be sufficient "feature-wise" for startups. Even if they don't have feature parity with AWS (I mean AWS is huge) it has, kubernets and serverless deployment options (functions, containers), S3 compatible object storage, managed databases, queues, llm hosted models, terraform provider.

Those should most of what startups need for deployment; at least what I've seen working with many over the last few years.

For those with pragmatic Linux Ops experience on the team, nothing will beat self-hosted on Hetzner dedicated servers, at a great price.

P.S. can't vouch for all Scaleway services, used it for a couple of VMs and hosted LLMs only. Happy to hear the experience of other users, no matter how few of those are here.

Free credits for startups are a different aspect of incentive, which is not negligible.

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

vishnukvmd4mo ago

We've been using Scaleway's compute, RDS and S3 offerings for Ente[1]'s cloud offering for over 5 years now.

RDS backups and retrivals from cold storage[2] are both a lot slower than AWS. The "high-availablity" instances for RDS are in the same DC, so the feature is cosmetic. Ignoring these, our experience has been pretty good. Quality of support is great.

While linking to [2] I realised that Scaleway's own website is behind Cloudflare, which is disappointing given they have their own DDoS protection[3].

[1]: https://github.com/ente-io/ente

[2]: https://www.scaleway.com/en/glacier-cold-storage/

[3]: https://www.scaleway.com/en/dedibox/ddos-protection/

nw056784mo ago

The real issue with Scaleway seems to be the lack of governance. I am more familiar with Azure and features like Entra and polices seems to be missing.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse