>One Human + One Agent = One Browser From Scratch
I at least expect you to read my post before replying.
That's not the case, the "one human" there is the one human prompting it: https://emsh.cat/one-human-one-agent-one-browser/
If your goalpost here is "no human involved at all" then it's a good thing I asked you what your goalposts were before spending any time on this!
UPDATE: OK I think I see what's happened here! You're asking to see an open source repo that was built using the "dark factory" pattern, where no code was even reviewed by a human.
I don't think I've seen one of those yet - I mean maybe that Cursor FastRender thing comes close?
It's a very radical technique. I don't think many people are trying this yet - I haven't been brave enough to try it myself yet.
I guess I kind of did that with my Python WASM library? That was an experiment in how far I could get with prompting and not reviewing, but it's not something I'd hold up as a shining example of how projects should be built: https://github.com/simonw/pwasm
Then the first example of a project done by AI without human intervention is someone who _explicitly_ states that they drove the way the agent behaved.
From the blog:
>The human who drives the agent might matter more than how the agents work and are set up, the judge is still out on this one
>If one person with one agent can produce equal or better results than "hundreds of agents for weeks", then the answer to the question: "Can we scale autonomous coding by throwing more agents at a problem?", probably has a more pessimistic answer than some expected.
I'm really not understanding what this proves other than the fact that AI + human is great and AI + AI is shit. Something that both me and the person who did the browser agreed on: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46783282
