undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmarginalia_nu2mo ago0 comments

Oh yeah, there's definitely room for improvement in that general direction. Indexing anchor texts is much better than page rank, but in isolation, it's not sufficient.

I've also seen some benefit fingerpinting the network traffic the websites make using a headless browser, to identify which ad networks they load. Very few spam sites have no ads, since there wouldn't be any economy in that.

e.g. https://marginalia-search.com/site/www.salon.com?view=traffi...

The full data set of DOM samples + recorded network traffic are in an enormous sqlite file (400GB+), and I haven't yet worked out any way of distributing the data yet. Though it's in the back of my mind as something I'd like to solve.

0 comments

dredmorbius2mo ago

Oh, that is clever!

I'd also suspect that there are networks / links which are more likely signs of low-value content than others. Off the top of my head, crypto, MLM, known scam/fraud sites, and perhaps share links to certain social networks might be negative indicators.

marginalia_nuOP2mo ago

You can actually identify clusters of websites based on the cosine similarity of their outbound links. Pretty useful for identifying content farms spanning multiple websites.

Have a lil' data explorer for this: https://explore2.marginalia.nu/

Quite a lot of dead links in the dataset, but it's still useful.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse