undefined | Better HN

0 pointshappytoexplain2mo ago0 comments

This is unrealistic and seems to be biased by some kind of broad un-focused hostility. Yes, maybe they were overstaffed. But it's reasonable to suspect that leadership overcut, given the current climate and the number being 15,000. Your characterization of Twitter predictions relies on cherry-picking and ignores the actual impacts, and there's no evidence that the system goes down without "constant" intervention from "thousands". Your tone also implies that large, complex systems, even if designed well, don't normally require a lot of maintenance from many people.

0 comments

schmuckonwheels2mo ago

>Your tone also implies that large, complex systems, even if designed well, don't normally require a lot of maintenance from many people.

That's correct.

In the case of Twitter, it was disclosed that many of their systems were running out of date EOL software, to the point of being a security liability, which raises the question: if the systems weren't being maintained, wtf were all those people doing? Taste-testing the free food and cappuccinos?

montjoy2mo ago

> many of their systems were running out of date EOL software, to the point of being a security liability

This is more likely a management problem rather than a staffing problem. Lower level management knows about these kind of things but often they are not incentivized to make them a priority due to a culture focused on growth and “winning”.

SSLy2mo ago

I work in the field. All of the software that's not sold by Huawei is steaming pile of excrements that only has accidental design.

You do need too many people to work with that. Cutting them is asking for pain.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse