undefined | Better HN

0 pointsyjftsjthsd-h5mo ago0 comments

My point was that (the article claims that) they didn't "reveal that the patches are malicious" at that point. Revert yes, reveal no.

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

worthless-trash5mo ago

IIRC one of them actually introduced a memory corrupting problem. I don't know if it got accepted or not. I remember seeing the issue and rejecting the patch for rhel.

arjie5mo ago

Man, what a mess.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse