Literature
Without references and citations—- never mind.
Go read Animal Farm
I don’t think I would have said anything if the opening statement wasn’t a “you do you, but”
Thanks for taking the time to call me out politely.
To be objective, we can ask the creator of tailwind how much honor he feels with his business just being weights in a model in someone else’s business
https://github.com/tailwindlabs/tailwindcss.com/pull/2388#is...
https://www.businessinsider.com/tailwind-engineer-layoffs-ai...
https://dev.to/kniraj/tailwind-css-lays-off-75-of-engineerin...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46527950
Going full hypertext computer history, this is why Ted Nelson believed in micro transactions on transclusions.
In modern terms— when ai bills by the tokens, those tokens should also get paid out to the source materials.
The business model is primarily broken, which is why that’s not happening, and why the main business use case is militarization of it.
That’s ai pilled
I write code under the mit license
I know the risk
Helping humans still makes it worth it
And technically these AI companies should have a /licenses route that lists every MIT piece of code their model was trained on.
That’s literally the only expectation I have from anyone as an active author using the MIT license, getting cited.
I think the legal AI defense is that the models themselves are a bastardized form of dynamic linking. I say the models are statically linked though, so they need to spill their sources.
