Google is actually kind of infamous for not using much in the way of OSS software.

The list of things I can think of is:

* Linux

* LLVM

* Webkit/Chrome (which they have done the majority of contributions to for a long time)

* Java & a little bit of Python

Not surprising these days. HN community wants in on the riches too before the industry crashes.

I think you are getting downvoted because your claim that “without Linux, Java and webkit it wouldn't exist” doesn’t pass the smell test. If Linux didn’t exist, maybe Google will just use one of the BSDs. If Java didn’t exist perhaps Google would just write more code in C++ instead; I’m pretty sure it still has more lines of C++ than Java. Or maybe Go would get invented a few years earlier. And if WebKit didn’t exist maybe Google would just fork KHTML themselves rather than forking a fork of KHTML. A lot of open source software appeared at the right time to be dominant, but without them other different open source software might dominate. But your argument isn’t about what if the entire OSS movement didn’t exist. It’s about what if specific OSS didn’t exist.

And what's your point? When interests align, what's there to complain about?

I'm not, nor have I ever been, a googler, btw. I did apply for a job there in 2006 but didn't make it past the first round (they were asking me obscure TCP/IP questions for a Java developer).

They created V8, kickstarted the modern browser wars with Chrome. They've sponsored tons of Open Source projects via Google Summer of Code. They've done more than their fair share. Half the devops stuff like Kubernetes, probably a lot of the early work related to linux containers, who knows what else.

There is always going to be someone who thinks they can do more. But they didn't have to do _any_ of it. Yet they did a ton.

People probably downvoted your comment because you sound angry and bitter. Get over yourself.