I wouldn't call it replacing the scheduler though - more that you've made a scheduler manager.
Scheduler Manager is definitely the more accurate term. Im just the middleman between the chaos and the kernel.
But seriously, it does really bug me on principle that DropBox should use over half a GB simply because it uses Chromium, even when nothing is visible.
With Groq speed (Llama 3 @ 800t/s), inference is finally fast enough to be in the system loop.
i built this TUI to monitor my process tree. instead of just showing CPU %, it checks the context (parent process, disk I/O) to decide if a process is compiling code or bloatware. It roasts, throttles, or kills based on that.
Its my experiment in "Intelligent Kernels" how they would be. i used Delta Caching to keep overhead low.
Now that’s a cursed take on power efficency
think of this more as a High-Level Governor. The NTOS scheduler decides which thread runs next, but this LLM decides if that process deserves to exist at all.
basically; NTOS tries to be fair to every process. BrainKernel overrides that fairness with judgment. if i suspend a process, i have effectively vetoed the scheduler.
This is a super simplification of the NTOS scheduler. It's not that dumb!
> if i suspend a process, i have effectively vetoed the scheduler.
I mean, I suppose? It's the NTOS scheduler doing the suspension. It's like changing the priority level -- sure, you can do it, but it's generally to your detriment outside of corner cases.
A 'Focus Mode' that doesn't just block URLs but literally murders the process if I open Steam or Civilization VI.
I could probably add a --mode strict flag that swaps the system prompt to be a ruthless productivity coach. 'Oh, you opened Discord? Roast and Kill.'
Thanks for the idea mate!
Sadly the only project I've found was for windows OS
