undefined | Better HN

0 pointsWJW4mo ago0 comments

I know they run truly parallel when they're doing work, but GC still stops the world, right?

Assuming you mean "because with Ruby::Box classes and modules have an extra indirection to go though." in the second paragraph, I don't understand why that would be necessary. Can't you just have completely separate boxes with their own copies of all classes etc, or does that use too much memory? (Maybe some COW scheme might work, doodling project for the holidays acquired haha)

Anyway, very cool work and I hope it keeps improving! Thanks for 4.0 byroot!

0 comments

byroot4mo ago

> GC still stops the world, right?

Yes, Ractor local GC is the one feature that didn't make it into 4.0.

> Can't you just have completely separate boxes with their own copies of all classes etc, or does that use too much memory?

Ruby::Box is kinda complicated, and still need a lot of work, so it's unclear how the final implementation will be. Right now there is no CoW or any type of sharing for most classes, except for core classes.

Core classes are the same object (pointer) across all boxes, however they have a constant and method table for each box.

But overall what I meant to say is that Box wouldn't make GC any easier for Ractors.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse