I’m more curious how angel investors are being treated in these exits. If _they_ dry up the whole pipeline goes away
Non-essential employees and small investors without the incentive or pockets to fund a legal fight get offered as little as possible. This structure also provides lots of flexibility to the 'not acquirer' when it comes to paying off existing debts, leases, contracts, etc. Basically, this is the end of being an early employee or small angel investor potentially resulting in a lucrative payoff. You have to remain central and 'key' all the way through the 'not acquisition'. I expect smaller early stage investors will start demanding special terms to guarantee a certain level of payout in a 'not acquisition'. I also expect this to create some very unfortunate situations because an asset sale (as they used to be done), could be a useful and appropriate mechanism to preserve the products and some jobs of a failing (but not yet fully failed) company - which was better for customers and some employees than a complete smoking crater.
So the only ones getting shafted are the employees.
Yes, correct
During boom times it made more financial sense to go straight to a FAANG if you could.
Let's face it and accept that the golden days of people working in tech startup (and soon large companies) are over.
RIP 1980 - 2023.
I guess you'll have to face the music at some point.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?location...
/s
Boy, it would be so nice if a major correction were to drain these massive companies' warchests so that it doesn't become more common.