https://beta.thread.is/t/c487c28d-285c-4349-8e0f-396699df3e9...
But i could still see this being interesting in some contexts.
Personally I find it quite interesting that sharing a link with someone has different psychological perceptions than forwarding an email. There is implied trust with an email conversation - but the reality is you never know who is being BCC'd.
Alternatively, what happens if I have a group thread and someone replies directly to me rather than "reply all".
Looks super clean but I'm just wondering about some unintended consequences that might come up if I use it.
This particular version relies on Google's conversation grouping implementation to extract the appropriate emails. If someone replies out of context, that would be up to a human to move into a new Thread. We had some thoughts like "fork from here" or "create a new conversation".
Right now your email conversations are not automatically sync'd but when they are, any reply to your email conversation (what Gmail interprets as such) would be appended to the page.
Unintended Consequences? Isn't that the whole idea? ;)
Of course, you can also use Google Groups for a private mailing list, but here you can store a thread (which, like gmail, is nicely collapsed) without having to synchronize everyone joining your group. Handy for document support requests via email.
On a side note, it'll be great if you could show me email conversation happening in mailing lists. It'll be a relief from those boring and complicated interfaces. for eg such email thread can be represented in this format http://librelist.com/browser//easymode/2011/10/9/using-djang...
Something with a little intelligence which referenced meetings & other emails would be a sick corporate knowledge base.
Looks good, though I have a comment. How come I don't see the date and time per email on the thread?
