undefined | Better HN

0 pointssmonff3mo ago0 comments

Some of the deleted pages never had the « sources missing » tag set for a significative time. It has been straight to deletion point.

Some pages that survived the deletion (e.g. TPRF) had the « missing sources » tag set since 15 years… What, I have to admit, can justify some action. But it was not the case for the PerlMonks and Perl Mongers pages: those just got deleted on an extremely short notice, making it impossible for the community to attempt any improvement.

0 comments

Telaneo3mo ago

7 days is policy for a deletion proposal,[1] which I can agree is not really enough time, although it's usually extended if talks are still ongoing.

There aren't really any rules about putting up notices and such before proposing deletion, and if you can't find anything other than primary sources, it doesn't seem unreasonable to propose deletion than propose a fix which can't be implemented. Thankfully, someone did find reliable sources for some of the articles.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Prop...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointssmonff3mo ago0 comments

Some of the deleted pages never had the « sources missing » tag set for a significative time. It has been straight to deletion point.

0 comments

Telaneo3mo ago

7 days is policy for a deletion proposal,[1] which I can agree is not really enough time, although it's usually extended if talks are still ongoing.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Prop...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse