And that's why I made the argument that it wasn't slightly more expensive. It's possible it would have cost more to add subtitles than the entire rest of the project combined.

I think it's fair to mandate subtitles when there's a certain level of budget. I don't think it's a good idea to unconditionally mandate subtitles.

> UC Berkeley is a public university and they have to adhere to certain rules

In their normal course of action. I don't think this side project was plugged in to the core tasks of the university.

Shutting it down counts as lazy but what do you want a project with minimal budget to do?

We're not shaming other universities for not putting courses online. We're only shaming one that did it "badly" and then gave up. That's unfair. Every other university that doesn't fund similar subtitles and uploads should get the same reaction.

And by "badly" I mean it still had okay subtitles, just not particularly good ones.