Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
zozbot234
7mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
A postfix "*" would be completely redundant since you can just use p[0] . Instead of *p++ you'd have (p++)[0] - still quite workable.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
fastaguy88
7mo ago
You're kidding, right? (p++)[0] returns the contents of (p) before the ++. Its hard to imagine a more confusing juxtaposition.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse