undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrootusrootus7mo ago0 comments

> If I can capture photons with my eyes, but then I try to do it with a machine, and you say, "hey, you can't use a machine for that!" then you are telling me that I can't engage in general purpose computing.

You can capture photons with your eyes, and you can use an image sensor to capture photons. Seems pretty equivalent.

But your brain cannot store images or recall them in the future (even for yourself, it is a very lossy recall), or transmit them to another person, etc. That is all completely separate functionality that is not equivalent to what your brain can do.

0 comments

4 comments · 1 top-level

jMyles7mo ago· 3 in thread

So if I have an implant that encodes and digitally records impulses on my optic nerve, allowing me to replay and share things I have previously seen, then can the law justly require me to avert my eyes as the emperor walks past? Obviously not.

And what of the martian who uses a very powerful telescope to record public activities of earthlings - do our laws extend to her? Do we own the photons that bounce off of our skin unto the ends of reality? Obviously, totally not. That's not how any of this works.

You're allowed to capture photons. You are built with devices that do just say. And you're allowed to build other devices to do that.

rootusrootusOP7mo ago

> can the law justly require me to avert my eyes as the emperor walks past?

Given that you chose to get the implant, I'd say the answer is yes. What you have done is no different than walking around with a camera and taking pictures of everything your eyes point at. So it can be regulated the same way.

> And what of the martian

If she sets foot in our jurisdiction, then she's toast.

jMyles7mo ago

> What you have done is no different than walking around with a camera and taking pictures of everything your eyes point at.

Exactly! So what is the distinction between capturing photons with your retinas vs. with a camera sensor that, in your mind, suddenly gives the state authority to intervene?

> If she sets foot in our jurisdiction, then she's toast.

I don't know what "our" jurisdiction means on the internet. If she sets up a streaming server and makes it available to all earthlings, then what?

1 more reply

jakelazaroff7mo ago

> And what of the martian who uses a very powerful telescope to record public activities of earthlings - do our laws extend to her? Do we own the photons that bounce off of our skin unto the ends of reality? Obviously, totally not. That's not how any of this works.

Martians don't exist, so yeah, of course that's not how anything works!

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse