undefined | Better HN

0 pointscrote4mo ago0 comments

The problem is that all the AI companies have been getting incredibly intertwined, see [0] for example. Nvidia isn't just selling chips - it is also actively investing in its own customers in order to drive up demand. This is giving us neat headlines like "NVIDIA intends to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI as the new NVIDIA systems are deployed". The Coreweave deal is even worse: Nvidia is investing in Coreweave, so that Coreweave can buy GPUs from Nvidia, so that Nvidia can rent compute from Coreweave.

Sure, Nvidia is making crazy money right now, but what's going to happen to all those deals when the market blinks and some of those lesser players start falling over?

[0]: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-investment-is-sta...

0 comments

pants24mo ago

To some degree this is normal - for example I worked at a med device startup where we got investment from one of our manufacturing partners. That helped with growth which in turn meant more manufacturing work for them, and presumably they'd be happy to invest in another round and keep the flywheel going as long as there is some real outside demand.

I honestly think it's a great model for incentive alignment and not that sketchy on the surface. For the manufacturer, it's guaranteed revenue with upside convexity. For the startup, it's better terms and priority from the manufacturers since they have a stake in your success.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointscrote4mo ago0 comments

Sure, Nvidia is making crazy money right now, but what's going to happen to all those deals when the market blinks and some of those lesser players start falling over?

[0]: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/ai-investment-is-sta...

0 comments

pants24mo ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse