"Although this is a major upgrade version of pgModeler it is recommended NOT EXPORT the models created directly to production environments. Not all possible code generation were tested in this way, is its your own risk export the models into environments that are not intended for testing. The project's author is not responsible for any possible loss of data due the inappropriate use of this tool."
What open source project would be bold enough to say he will be responsible for all loss due to using his tool.
How many proprietary products would? Last time I checked a very popular one prohibited customers from even publishing their own benchmarks...
The only code I would trust is the code I generate myself... ;)
I dunno about you, but it's pretty clear that the code I generate myself is the last code I would trust.
Develop an application for support of financial and tax regulations for a certain country. You will have verbs and nouns which describe the situation clearly.
You develop an application from specifications written another language than English. They exist.
The biggest failure I keep seeing are futile attempts to translate concepts under these circumstances into English.
I agree in this case: when you want to invite collaboration on github, English (or Chinese?) would be better suited.
But for Open Source projects coding in English is probably the best way to attract contributors.
Will update here later with an English fork.
You can give pgXplorer (http://pgxplorer.com) a shot which is open source and the binaries are readily available. Disclaimer: I am the lead dev of pgXplorer.
No, I don't count 'not looking native' as a problem.
