Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
csande17
7mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
They have a document that they sometimes describe using the word "specification", but its README clarifies that it's not actually a specification:
> The FLS is not intended to be used as the normative specification of the Rust language
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
woodruffw
7mo ago
To be clear, my argument doesn't hinge on whether FLS is a normative specification of Rust or not. The argument is that being "specified" is neither necessary nor sufficient for language maturity or quality.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse