undefined | Better HN

0 pointslinguae7mo ago0 comments

This is also consistent with Apple’s previous behavior with backwards compatibility, where Apple would provide a few years of support for the previous platform but will strongly nudge developers and users to move on. The Classic environment in Mac OS X that enabled classic Mac OS apps to run didn’t survive the Intel switch and was unavailable in Leopard even for PowerPC Macs, and the original Rosetta for PowerPC Mac OS X applications was not included starting with Lion, the release after Snow Leopard.

0 comments

5 comments · 1 top-level

delusional7mo ago· 4 in thread

Honestly, for apple this is above and beyond. They've killed support with less fanfare and compatibility support than what we see here.

bigyabai7mo ago

Bully on me for owning hardware and expecting it to behave consistently across OTA updates.

delusional7mo ago

The hardware isn't (as far as I'm aware) changing. Please don't move the goalposts for hardware ownership (we just be able to do with our hardware as we please) to also include indefinite support from vendors. That just makes us looks like childish crybabies.

If you were instead asking for hardware documentation, or open-sourcing of Rosetta once sunset, then we're on the same team.

1 more reply

renewiltord7mo ago

I think you probably should not buy Apple hardware. It is not a guarantee they have ever offered that their software would behave consistently across updates. If this mattered to me, I would have done some research and rapidly found out that Apple has done this every few years for the last 30 years.

1 more reply

searls7mo ago

At what point in history have you owned a particular piece of hardware for use with a particular piece of never-to-be-updated software and installed a major OEM operating system release a full 7 years after release without issue?

I doubt such a thing has ever happened in the history of consumer-facing computing.

4 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse