> Funny to accuse someone of "spreading misinformation" while agreeing there are instances where they are correct, then asserting there are some instances where they are incorrect while giving no concrete examples yourself.

It's not funny, it's accurate.

Spending seconds looking into the history of policing worldwide, or in the US, would back up my claim.

Had the parent poster bothered to post evidence backing up their comment, I probably would have made the effort to post citations refuting it.

> So saying something that is correct but not for all cases (which ones would those be) is now "spreading misinformation"?

When you say that something is correct in all cases, yes.

> I'm not sure what joy you derive from dismissing statements you already acknowledge have an element of veracity with some blanket label of "misinformation", but you should probably reconsider it.

Nice try, but there is no "element of veracity" to an absolute statement that is objectively false.