See all platforms that have their identity tied with a specific language, the platform's language always has a guaranteed future as long as the platform continues to be industry relevant.
The others on top, come and go.
Full of Least Surprise violations, and just far too goddamned big. Did 3 try to pare that back into something reasonable?
It’s certainly a case that languages need to be championed by competent IDE writers otherwise they fail to scale. Because you can’t have 50 devs all using neovim - and only neovim - without making a huge gigantic mess. Large projects can sustain a few brilliant people working with one hand tied behind their back but not everyone.
The issue for me is that Scala design lacks focus. They say yes to too many features.
