undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrhetocj235mo ago0 comments

And then people turn around and hand-wave that away by saying: But youre assuming that the development of LLMs stop and they wont be able to address that problem.

Like Okay, it sounds like a valid point. The issue is the hand waving and the fact it is not grounded in reality.

0 comments

osn93637395mo ago

The assumption that it will just keep getting better is a big one. Maybe they will. Maybe they wont. If they get better I'll stop complaining. Right now I just don't think they are at the level people claim.

MonkeyClub5mo ago

I took GP's comment to say that, even if LLMs get massively better in the next six months (which they will), the colleagues still have to wade through the slop during the review this week.

So while one person is getting a 5x increase in productivity, one or two get a corresponding 5x decrease.

brandon2725mo ago

Why would we expect LLMs to get “massively better” in the next 6 months instead of the incremental improvement we have seen to date?

coliveira5mo ago

LLMs didn't get massively better in the last 6 months, and most probably won't get this better in the next 6 months either.

mmmBacon5mo ago

I disagree. Couldn’t do what I’m doing with GPT-4 but I can with 5.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse