Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
raincom
7mo ago
0 comments
Share
AI just picked up these references and gave an answer. Scientists in this field should have read these papers instead of relying on AI.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
rdedev
7mo ago
From what I understand they used a diffusion model (diffdock) to predict the mechanism. These types of models are not LLMs that need to be trained on text
D-Coder
7mo ago
There are probably 37,392 papers on this. So your "should" is probably just impossible for humans.
FollowingTheDao
7mo ago
This is such a ridiculous argument. They could have read five papers, couldn’t they?
klustregrif
7mo ago
Picking up five needles is trivial. Picking up five needles in 50000 haystacks is difficult.
D-Coder
7mo ago
How do they know which five papers to read?
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse