I get a little concerned about the business model. Almost to the point that it would prevent me from hosting my code with them for fear of them going out of business or raising their prices later.
The current git repo for the commercial product I work on is 850MB. This is millions of lines of code + 8-9 years of development (migrated from svn at some point). That means we could be happy at the $5 month range.
If you get 1000 customers X $5, you're making $5000/month. I make way more than that as an employee.
Of course, you have people that will need more than 2GB but I think it's rare.
tl;dr raise your prices. I think it will help you get more business.
tl;dr We're not raising prices or shutting Legit Teams down because it's not a business, but a tool that we use, and will keep using. Having others on board is a bonus! :)
Not sure if we're typical or how much load 30,000 users would generate. Personally, I pull/push at least once a day. Just something for you to keep in mind.
There's no way I'm going through the hassle of expensing $5 a month, but $60 for a years service isn't going to raise any queries with finance.
I strongly recommend that you read the first of the Copy Hacks books: the one on messaging. Key is the insights on identifying the motivations of your users.
Best of luck!
Sorry for the delay!
I think it actually looks better than bitbucket which some have mentioned which to me looks really cluttered.
I am not a student though so maybe i should not be looking at this as an option for a business anyway, but still...
I can't foresee all scaling issues that may come to pass; for what it's worth, I can tell you that I have trust in the people behind Legit Teams to solve these problems.
In turn, I can only ask for you to try our service and see if pushing becomes a problem. I'd then love to hear your feedback via our contact page based on your experience.
Legit Teams, by contrast, allocates an individual user per member who signs up. Thus, SSH key lookups are limited to only the keys that one person has. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this circumvents the scaling issue entirely.
But I think evanbarter's question is valid: why this over BitBucket? Any compelling reasons...
Just feedback to say that arranging for custom plans at 2GB seems low.
Edit: It would be great if they add support for DSA too.