undefined | Better HN

0 pointstw047mo ago0 comments

> People need to understand that most reformists don't want to get rid of the truly exceptional immigration to the US.

And how are “they” planning on determining who is “truly exceptional”? And what makes you think the “truly exceptional” ones are still going to have any interest in coming here when they see what happens to the people who the current regime deems “not exceptional”?

I sure as hell wouldn’t come to the US knowing I may be deported to a third world prison if I post the wrong thing online.

0 comments

jwblock7mo ago

I don't think you need to define 'truly exceptional.' You just need to put in a limit and the scarcity will force the slots to go to the best and rarest talent. I'm all for bringing the truly best and brightest to the US. I'm not for replacing large swaths of the domestic labor force with an imported lower price equivalent.

carlosjobim7mo ago

> And how are “they” planning on determining who is “truly exceptional”?

For example by implementing a $100 000 fee for their H-1B visas, which ensures that companies will only use those visas to contract truly exceptional talent. That's a very small price to pay for a company to be able to hire a person who is among the greatest in the world in her field.

xp847mo ago

I don't think there's an H1B category for online political edgelords anyway -- we have enough of those already on both sides of the political spectrum, so I don't think anyone cares if that type of person is afraid to come here. If anything, maybe it's better to have less of that kind of thing so we can focus on getting things done instead of political partisanship?

Nasrudith7mo ago

Given this administration? Truly exceptional are the ones who pay personal bribes.

ratonbox7mo ago

For exceptional ability, you have the O-1 visas.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse