undefined | Better HN

0 pointsal_borland6mo ago0 comments

This is my #1 issue. I simply don’t trust them and I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point. They’ve been violating my trust for decades.

I’m happy to let them prove out the tech, and if/when a company enters the market with a compelling product that I can trust, I will consider that competing product.

0 comments

throwoutway6mo ago

OP is taking videos of his baby with these when Meta's page here doesn't event mention data privacy or security of the user's information or how it protects them

vasco6mo ago

All babies look the same, out of anything private you could film by mistake, a baby seems pretty harmless.

dweekly6mo ago

Face recognition is uninuitively good. Google Photos was able to pick out faces from my baby photos pretty easily.

5 more replies

SXX6mo ago

Well. Until that film or metadata getting uploaded on Meta servers or checked by some local child-safety AI, getting flagged for inappropriate meterial and police knocking on your door.

lynndotpy6mo ago

I disagree with your assumption, but you also need to consider that the baby is going to be a person for decades.

latexr6mo ago

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...

jahsome6mo ago

Yeah and stupid babies are too stupid to consent anyway

JKCalhoun6mo ago

Note: user has baby.

1 more reply

frosting13376mo ago

Yes, it does, the link to Data & Privacy is at the bottom.

JKCalhoun6mo ago

> I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point…

I suspect it's impossible as long as Zuckerberg is involved in the company.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsal_borland6mo ago0 comments

This is my #1 issue. I simply don’t trust them and I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point. They’ve been violating my trust for decades.

I’m happy to let them prove out the tech, and if/when a company enters the market with a compelling product that I can trust, I will consider that competing product.

0 comments

throwoutway6mo ago

OP is taking videos of his baby with these when Meta's page here doesn't event mention data privacy or security of the user's information or how it protects them

vasco6mo ago

All babies look the same, out of anything private you could film by mistake, a baby seems pretty harmless.

dweekly6mo ago

Face recognition is uninuitively good. Google Photos was able to pick out faces from my baby photos pretty easily.

5 more replies

SXX6mo ago

Well. Until that film or metadata getting uploaded on Meta servers or checked by some local child-safety AI, getting flagged for inappropriate meterial and police knocking on your door.

lynndotpy6mo ago

I disagree with your assumption, but you also need to consider that the baby is going to be a person for decades.

latexr6mo ago

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/aug/22/google-cs...

jahsome6mo ago

Yeah and stupid babies are too stupid to consent anyway

JKCalhoun6mo ago

Note: user has baby.

1 more reply

frosting13376mo ago

Yes, it does, the link to Data & Privacy is at the bottom.

JKCalhoun6mo ago

> I don’t know that there is a realistic path to build that trust at this point…

I suspect it's impossible as long as Zuckerberg is involved in the company.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse