Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
edflsafoiewq
9mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
My takeaway from this story has always been that both MS and Plan 9 simply passively implemented Unicode as received. It was only IBM that had the vision to see that the encoding was wrong and they should make a new one.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
anonymars
9mo ago
But doesn't OS/2 still use UCS-2 internally? And only years later (1995+)?
Potential source:
https://ia802804.us.archive.org/13/items/os2developmentrelat...
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse