> Citation needed on that one.
I can't speak for every country but Copyright laws in the US, EU and UK require a human creator to be valid for copyright.
A casual search brought up this:
- https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/03/appell...
- https://www.openpolicy.co/resources/u-s-copyright-office-cla...
- https://www.jonesday.com/en/insights/2025/02/copyrightabilit...
To add to that you can't patent anything created by an AI either.
> What do you know that they don't?
Oh they are well aware of this.
At enterprise level coding, everything normally needs a programmers certificate of origin as it were. So AI generated code is tagged within the source.
A good example of this (pre-gpt) was SCO vs IBM. Where SCO claimed IBM stole their code. IBM could prove the full history of code they created because of these procedures.
So.. if a person vibe codes a whole application and it gets stolen/copied, legally they have no way to protect that.
[edit] Reading further for UK when it comes to computer generated the law is a bit vague when it comes to vibe coding. There are laws to protect digital works. [edit]