undefined | Better HN

0 pointschrismorgan7mo ago0 comments

> alternatively, you can put the type arguments into the .collect() calls:

Instead of writing out a turbofish both times, I’d probably leave the first unannotated and put `::Vec<Vec<_>>` on the second one.

0 comments

Tuna-Fish7mo ago

Fair. I didn't even consider how that variant should be done, because whenever I find myself writing a turbofish I instantly ask myself, can I put this type in a definition somewhere instead?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointschrismorgan7mo ago0 comments

> alternatively, you can put the type arguments into the .collect() calls:

Instead of writing out a turbofish both times, I’d probably leave the first unannotated and put `::Vec<Vec<_>>` on the second one.

0 comments

Tuna-Fish7mo ago

Fair. I didn't even consider how that variant should be done, because whenever I find myself writing a turbofish I instantly ask myself, can I put this type in a definition somewhere instead?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse