undefined | Better HN

0 pointsaisosozjbx10mo ago0 comments

Why not? Seems to match the trend of tech innovation creating more demand for tech.

The reality is lots of software problems can’t be solved with the level of “intelligence” LLMs have. And if they could, it wouldn’t be just software in danger - it’d be every human profession. Even the physical ones, since AI would quickly figure out how to build machinery to automate those.

0 comments

5 comments · 2 top-level

enraged_camel10mo ago· 3 in thread

>> Why not?

Because it's just cope. Look at the current reality. Are companies rushing to fix bad or even buggy code written by human devs? No, not in most cases. In most cases, if a piece of code "works", it is left the hell alone. And that's the thing about AI code: it does work. The quality is irrelevant in the overwhelming majority of cases (especially if it's other AIs that are adding to it, which is the case more and more often).

westurner10mo ago

> The quality is irrelevant in the overwhelming majority of cases

Software quality is especially important in safety critical applications.

We should not expect an LLM trained solely on formally-verified code to produce formally-verified code. I don't think that also training on specs and hateful training material will fix that.

So then we're back to the original software engineering objectives of writing better SAST, DAST, Formal Method, side channel, and fuzzing tools for software quality assurance.

ponector10mo ago

Ok, then 10% of the current IT workforce will be allocated to the critical applications. The rest 90% will be replaced with Claude SuperGPT CODER 6.2.

Like ~100k people in Meta - nothing critical there, right? Many thousands could be replaced with AI-coders there.

OkayPhysicist10mo ago

I've been to birthday parties that employed more people than "safety critical" software development. We're talking about 99.99% of the software development jobs evaporating.

1 more reply

ncr10010mo ago

The industry might evolve to "AI Please rewrite the faulty code and redeploy, eating the cost of inefficiencies as business expense, instead of hiring back to the Full Software Engineering Employment Levels".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse