undefined | Better HN

0 points9rx7mo ago0 comments

Your half of the definition is implied, but uninteresting. They would not see the 100B economic impact without your definition being realized. But what is curious about it is that it is also not to be considered AGI without meeting the value marker. "a highly autonomous system that can outperform humans at most economically valuable work." alone is not sufficient.

0 comments

famouswaffles7mo ago

>Your half of the definition is implied, but uninteresting.

How is it uninteresting? Open AI had revenue of $12B last year without monetizing literally hundreds of millions of free users in any way whatsoever (not even ads).

Microsoft's cloud revenue has exploded in the last few years off the back of AI model services. Let's not even get into the other players.

100B in economic impact is more than achievable with the technology we have today right now. That half is the interesting part.

9rxOP7mo ago

> Open AI had revenue of $12B last year

And it could have been $1T for all anyone cares. The impact was delivered by humans. This is about impact delivered by AGI.

famouswaffles7mo ago

That makes no sense. Money generated by direct usage is economic impact by the model.

If you use GPT-N substantially in your work, then saying that impact rests solely on you is nonsensical.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 points9rx7mo ago0 comments

0 comments

famouswaffles7mo ago

>Your half of the definition is implied, but uninteresting.

How is it uninteresting? Open AI had revenue of $12B last year without monetizing literally hundreds of millions of free users in any way whatsoever (not even ads).

Microsoft's cloud revenue has exploded in the last few years off the back of AI model services. Let's not even get into the other players.

100B in economic impact is more than achievable with the technology we have today right now. That half is the interesting part.

9rxOP7mo ago

> Open AI had revenue of $12B last year

And it could have been $1T for all anyone cares. The impact was delivered by humans. This is about impact delivered by AGI.

famouswaffles7mo ago

That makes no sense. Money generated by direct usage is economic impact by the model.

If you use GPT-N substantially in your work, then saying that impact rests solely on you is nonsensical.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse