undefined | Better HN

0 pointszvr7mo ago0 comments

I agree with the first part ("current Sentry isn't Open Source"), not with the second one ("unless there's an actual community"). A software can be Open Source without actual development community.

Ah, wait -- you don't say that Open Source requires a community. You state that, if there was interest in the older version of Sentry, then that version could be considered as Open Source. I agree with this one as well, then.

[I considered deleting this comment, but maybe it will be useful to others who have not read closely.]

0 comments

JoshTriplett7mo ago

Right, exactly. I'm not saying a project must have a community in order to be Open Source. I'm saying in order to be considered for a list like this, something should be a project in its own right rather than just a stale version of another project.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointszvr7mo ago0 comments

I agree with the first part ("current Sentry isn't Open Source"), not with the second one ("unless there's an actual community"). A software can be Open Source without actual development community.

[I considered deleting this comment, but maybe it will be useful to others who have not read closely.]

0 comments

JoshTriplett7mo ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse