undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmardifoufs7mo ago0 comments

They have been settling the only territory that actually stopped the armed struggle against Israel. The West Bank has literally kicked out Hamas, stopped fighting for years, and given up their arms for the most part. And Israel has been relentlessly colonizing them since then, as a show of good faith I guess. The Palestinians there have absolutely 0 recourse, and will eventually lose all of their home land.

But I'm sure they wouldn't have done the same to Gaza if they would've just done the right thing by kicking off Hamas, and stopping any armed resistance !

I mean they didn't literally kill every single arab in Gaza yet so they are very progressive. They'd rather just slowly settle your land and kill you if you resist, as opposed to Hamas who would've done the same but faster. Let's not forget that they have killed tens of thousands of Muslims, but at least they could've killed even more!

0 comments

tguvot7mo ago

Actually hamas, pij and other organizations are alive and kicking in West Bank. There are areas that PA doesn't control because of them. Last year PA tried to deal with them, failed and called in Israel in order to take out hamas. PA in West Bank exists only because Israeli military supports it.

Also there is non stop attempts (some successful and some not) to execute terror attacks from West Bank. It just never appears in Western media

mardifoufsOP7mo ago

Still, as you said they are also hunted down and are marginal in the West Bank. It did nothing to stop Israel from settling as they pleased.

And the Fatah also stopped armed resistance on their own, and fought off Hamas. So while the PA might only exist now because Israel props them up, that wasn't the case 20 years ago, not to the same extent.

The West Bank Palestinians there went for a more pacifist route and in return, got the biggest wave of unbridled settlements in the past 60 years. And they have lost any mean to even scare the settlers off. The settlers know that they are almost entirely defenseless, relatively speaking.

tguvot7mo ago

a) not marginal. they are powerful enough to create "no-go zones" for PA and to attempt executing terror acts in Israel

b) i'll suggest you to take a look how many new settlements israel build in last 20 years or so. it may surprise you

c) Fatah didn't stop armed resistance. It military wings got wiped by Israel in second intifada. And it didn't fought off Hamas. It lost to Hamas in Gaza and survived in west bank because Israel is present there

d) west bank palestinians didn't went a more pacifist route [-1]. it's just western media doesn't cover palestinian violence in west bank. as i previously suggested, check out how many new settlements were build in last 20 years.

[-1] https://www.jns.org/over-6300-terror-attacks-against-jews-in...

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsmardifoufs7mo ago0 comments

But I'm sure they wouldn't have done the same to Gaza if they would've just done the right thing by kicking off Hamas, and stopping any armed resistance !

0 comments

tguvot7mo ago

Also there is non stop attempts (some successful and some not) to execute terror attacks from West Bank. It just never appears in Western media

mardifoufsOP7mo ago

Still, as you said they are also hunted down and are marginal in the West Bank. It did nothing to stop Israel from settling as they pleased.

tguvot7mo ago

a) not marginal. they are powerful enough to create "no-go zones" for PA and to attempt executing terror acts in Israel

b) i'll suggest you to take a look how many new settlements israel build in last 20 years or so. it may surprise you

[-1] https://www.jns.org/over-6300-terror-attacks-against-jews-in...

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse