"Protecting women" is an incoherent excuse for pressuring websites to pull romantic games that feature consensual, loving, respectful homosexual male-male relationships, with no women even present in the game.

The real motivations seemingly have nothing to do with protecting women, which appears to simply be a palatable facade for the true intention to suppress all depictions of sexuality, including the depictions that offer good-faith representation of historically marginalized groups.

The irony is that many if not most of the porn ARTISTS I have know or known of are women, in a subculture that skews male *heavily*.

And video games are just art.

So, women, drawing and writing stuff they like, being banned and losing an income stream.

I don’t think drawing or writing porn is exploitative at all.

> laims to be an Australian feminist organization

I'm genuinely curious to see how this plays out in the American partisan landscape.

They are however influenced by the American discourse soup of lies and talking points, in the same way that the NZ mosque shooter was.

Conservatives around the world talk to each other.