What moral system do you advocate? Laissez-faire?
And what if, tomorrow, the payment processors capitulate with a new morality? They decide women politicians shouldn't be allowed to take donations, for instance?
Sex workers should be better supported and the markets cleansed via strict regulation of the labor and how it's treated, and strong unions.
Payment processors making a shady porn underground using backdoor finances, even more than it already is, will do nothing but make this problem worse.
Live sex work already involves existing payment processors.
Porn addicts are definitionally addicted to fantasy. I wish you luck with the rest of your comment.
Truly, the horror!
Is infantilizing women as incapable of making their own choices better? Should we also take away their credit cards because they just can't be trusted? Yes, reductio ad absurdum, but I hope you can see the point I'm making.
You rate limit loans to mitigate harm potential, you don't ban them outright.
Most manual labor takes a toll on the body, so we make OSHA and do our best to make sure employers are minimizing how bad it gets. You don't ban manual labor.
Sex, and porn, are normal affairs. Protect the people involved and elevate the working class. Don't drive them into an even shadier, less controlled market.
Unfortunately, I'm fully aware I can't convince you.
There is scientific consensus on this!
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/2018...
You advocate for taking ownership over women’s bodies, because clearly you know best apparently?
The game theory of this social theory is badly flawed. People who adhere to it will always serve those who form groups and enforce in-out distinctions.
