undefined | Better HN

0 pointskragen9mo ago0 comments

The relevant feature of Dyneema is specifically that its Young's modulus is much higher than most other organic fibers, about half that of steel, which is probably what you mean by "neither material has much elasticity".

Steel cables would work just as well if weight isn't a consideration, but I think Dyneema is likely to be more resistant to abrasion. However, heat produced by any significant dynamic friction will ruin it immediately, as I found to my sorrow. Kevlar is much more heat-resistant, and of course steel is more heat-resistant than Kevlar.

0 comments

darksaints9mo ago

He actually used steel cables for his initial prototypes, but steel cables have a problem with rolling fatigue that actually gets worse the larger the diameter...so if a tiny steel cable is not strong enough, you might actually have to change the gear dimensions (and therefore ratios) in order to not fatigue them.

Animats9mo ago

Right. Steel cables have to be oiled internally if flexed frequently. This was a major cause of cable failure in gym exercise machines for decades. Newer exercise machines tend to use synthetic flat straps over pulleys.

kragenOP9mo ago

The Sandia paper also claimed that steel cables need a larger pulley radius.

regularfry9mo ago

Dyneema is much easier to work with, too.

I'm quite fond of bowstring as a material for this sort of thing. It usually has other fibres mixed in with it so it's a little more bouncy than raw dyneema but that's minimised if you get thread that's intended for crossbows. It's usually waxed so there's some friction to it when you're manipulating it, and it's also easy to source.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse