undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjchoksi8mo ago0 comments

> So you'd have at least one user (most likely more) getting infected first, and once detected more users wouldn't be able to install it regardless.

This is where your and my intentions differ. I don't want the average Arch user to be infected when it can be prevented because the malware is known about.

0 comments

diggan8mo ago

> I don't want the average Arch user to be infected when it can be prevented because the malware is known about.

Me neither, my argument would be that VirusTotal won't stop the initial users from getting infected, so not good enough in my mind.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsjchoksi8mo ago0 comments

> So you'd have at least one user (most likely more) getting infected first, and once detected more users wouldn't be able to install it regardless.

This is where your and my intentions differ. I don't want the average Arch user to be infected when it can be prevented because the malware is known about.

0 comments

diggan8mo ago

> I don't want the average Arch user to be infected when it can be prevented because the malware is known about.

Me neither, my argument would be that VirusTotal won't stop the initial users from getting infected, so not good enough in my mind.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse