undefined | Better HN

0 pointspydave13y ago0 comments

They could have gone with the CC approach:

For humans: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

For lawyers: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode

Granted, Microsoft's lawyers probably wouldn't approve (because people might argue that they're agreeing to the simplified terms that have wriggle room and not the iron-clad legalese).

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

tedunangst13y ago

I think that works for CC because the people using the license are using the license and not the summary. It's ok if a third party to the licensor provides a summary.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse