undefined | Better HN

0 pointsajb8mo ago0 comments

There's nothing especially wrong with using an existing backend design and transitioning it to another ISA; a number of teams did that from mips->arm and had success with the result. Of course, if you ship too early you may be missing some features.

0 comments

monocasa8mo ago

> a number of teams did that from mips->arm and had success with the result.

Do you have any examples? Apple Silicon cores took pieces of the pwerficient cores, and everything else I know of either tweaked an official ARM design or started more or less from scratch.

ajbOP8mo ago

Here is one: https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/cavium/microarchitectures/vulca...

I don't know the details of how much rework they had to do.

As I understand it cavium still sells processors but only directly to hyperscalers.

Ironically Cavium may have gone through the same process with their previous design, but given that they then acquired this one from broadcom, perhaps it didn't go very well! I have no concrete information though.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse